Journal article
Caitlin M. Pinciotti, H. Orcutt
Journal of interpersonal violence, 2021
Journal of interpersonal violence, 2021
Semantic Scholar
DOI
PubMed
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Pinciotti, C. M., & Orcutt, H. (2021). Understanding Gender Differences in Rape Victim Blaming: The Power of Social Influence and Just World Beliefs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Pinciotti, Caitlin M., and H. Orcutt. “Understanding Gender Differences in Rape Victim Blaming: The Power of Social Influence and Just World Beliefs.” Journal of interpersonal violence (2021).
MLA
Click to copy
Pinciotti, Caitlin M., and H. Orcutt. “Understanding Gender Differences in Rape Victim Blaming: The Power of Social Influence and Just World Beliefs.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2021.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{caitlin2021a,
title = {Understanding Gender Differences in Rape Victim Blaming: The Power of Social Influence and Just World Beliefs},
year = {2021},
journal = {Journal of interpersonal violence},
author = {Pinciotti, Caitlin M. and Orcutt, H.}
}
Abstract
Victims of sexual violence are frequently blamed by friends, family, or legal personnel in the aftermath of an attack, with men attributing greater blame on average than women. Victims’ experiences of being blamed may generate a vicious cycle in which they are more likely to be blamed in the future. Moreover, just world beliefs (JWB) have been studied extensively as an underlying cognitive mechanism that predicts greater blame. Studies examining the influence of social support on blame have yet to examine the unique role of JWB on these attributions. The current study examined blame attribution of a fictional rape victim who received either positive, negative, or neutral support from friends and family in a sample of 383 undergraduate men and women. Individually, social support and JWB were both significant predictors of blame, and women were more influenced by social support than men; specifically, gender was a more salient predictor of blame toward the positively supported victim, suggesting that positive support received by friends and family may evoke a domino effect of support from other women. Conditional effects revealed that JWB were most influential on blame when responding to the positively supported victim. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.
